Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 04:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,387 CVEs published, 389 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 2 | 35 | 26 | 1 | 1 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet576
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)402
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)296
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)189
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)183
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)163
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)157
- Path traversal (CWE-22)148
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
7,142 CVEs match these filters, page 174 of 286.
symfony incorrect authorization
Medium6.3EPSS 0.61%, higher than 50% of scored CVEssymfonyCVSS 4.0 · 6.3CWE-863
In Symfony http-foundation prior to versions 5.4.56, 6.4.50, 7.4.23, and 8.1.11, Symfony\Component\HttpFoundation\RequestMatcher, and RequestMatcher\MethodRequestMatcher which replaces it from 6.2.x on, matches a request against a list of HTTP methods. These compared the…
KAMSOFT ZSIRep Client Library improper certificate validation
Medium5.3EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsKAMSOFT ZSIRep Client LibraryCVSS 4.0 · 5.3CWE-295
The ZSIRep client library (ZSIREP.CLIENT.DLL) is vulnerable to improper server certificate validation. It registers a process-wide .NET callback that accepts any certificate for HTTPS connections without verification. This allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to impersonate the…
wazuh SQL injection
High7.1EPSS 0.24%, higher than 15% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-89
Wazuh versions from 4.0.0 before 4.14.9 contain a sql injection vulnerability in WazuhDBBackend._substitute_params due to sequential regex placeholder cross-contamination. Authenticated users with agent:read on one agent can inject UNION SELECT via the q and search parameters…
wazuh wazuh-dashboard-plugins incorrect authorization
High8.8EPSS 0.35%, higher than 28% of scored CVEswazuh wazuh-dashboard-pluginsCVSS 4.0 · 8.8CWE-863
Wazuh dashboard plugins from 4.9.0 before 4.14.9 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated dashboard users to override the Manager API Authorization header via the /api/request proxy endpoint. Attackers can supply nested body.headers.Authorization…
wazuh vulnerability
High8.2EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-297
Wazuh from 3.9.0 before 4.14.9 contains a missing TLS hostname verification vulnerability in the fluent-forward module's wm_fluent_ssl_ctx() that allows network attackers to impersonate the Fluentd collector by presenting any certificate chaining to the configured ca_file.…
wazuh server-side request forgery
High8.2EPSS 0.40%, higher than 34% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-918
Wazuh from 4.3.0 before 4.14.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GitHub module (wm_github.c) that trusts unvalidated Link rel="next" pagination URLs. Attackers controlling the next-page URL can make the manager send requests with the GitHub API token…
wazuh server-side request forgery
Medium6.3EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 6.3CWE-918
Wazuh from 3.7.0 before 4.14.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Azure wodle get_graph_events() function that follows @odata.nextLink without host or HTTPS validation. Attackers who influence the nextLink value can redirect manager requests to…
wazuh memory leak
High7.1EPSS 0.56%, higher than 47% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-401
Wazuh Manager from 3.0.0 before 4.14.9 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the generic JSON decoder that allows remote attackers to exhaust wazuh-analysisd memory via repeated static fields. Attackers can enroll an agent through passwordless enrollment and send events with…
wazuh stack-based buffer overflow
Medium6.8EPSS 0.13%, higher than 3% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 6.8CWE-121
Wazuh agent from 1.0.0 before 4.14.9 contains a stack-based buffer overflow in the logcollector snort-full log reader that miscalculates remaining buffer space in read_snortfull(). Attackers who write crafted multi-line content to a monitored snort-full log can overflow the…
wazuh out-of-bounds write
Medium6.9EPSS 0.56%, higher than 47% of scored CVEswazuhCVSS 4.0 · 6.9CWE-787
Wazuh from 1.0.0 before 4.14.9 contains an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in wazuh-execd that allows privileged manager-configuration attackers to corrupt root process memory via excess ar.conf entries. Attackers controlling ossec.conf active-response blocks can push over 64…
Johnson Controls EasyIO Neo IOManager and Tools Installer vulnerability
High8.6EPSS 0.08%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsJohnson Controls EasyIO Neo IOManager and Tools InstallerCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-316
Cleartext storage of sensitive information in memory vulnerability in Johnson Controls EasyIO Neo IOManager and Tools Installer allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects EasyIO Neo IOManager and Tools Installer: 1.1.0.0.
Johnson Controls EasyIO Neo IO Manager and Tools Installer vulnerability
High8.6EPSS 0.13%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsJohnson Controls EasyIO Neo IO Manager and Tools InstallerCVSS 4.0 · 8.6
Improper neutralization of input used for LLM prompting vulnerability in Johnson Controls EasyIO Neo IO Manager and Tools Installer allows Search Order Hijacking. This issue affects EasyIO Neo IO Manager and Tools Installer: 1.1.0.0.
Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000, Victor sensitive data in logs
High8.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsJohnson Controls C-CURE 9000, VictorCVSS 4.0 · 8.8CWE-532
Insertion of sensitive information into log file vulnerability in Johnson Controls C-CURE 9000, Victor allows Use of Known Operating System Credentials. This issue affects C-CURE 9000, Victor: 3.20.
HCL AION missing encryption
Low3.7EPSS 0.09%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 3.7CWE-311
HCL AION is affected by a missing encryption vulnerability in a second WebSocket connection defined in the GenAI web interface. The connection used the unencrypted WebSocket protocol (ws://test) instead of an encrypted (wss://) channel. This may allow data exchanged over the…
HCL AION information exposure
Medium4.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.8CWE-200
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where the Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) header was missing or insecure, allowing cross-origin documents to share a browsing context with the application. This may enable cross-window attacks, potentially resulting in unintended…
HCL AION information exposure
Medium4.2EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.2CWE-200
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where the Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) header was missing or insecure, so embedded cross-origin resources were not required to explicitly grant permission. This weakens cross-origin isolation, potentially resulting in unintended…
HCL AION information exposure
Medium4.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.8CWE-200
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where the Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) header was missing or insecure, allowing application resources to be loaded by other origins. This may expose resources to cross-origin data leakage, potentially resulting in unintended…
HCL AION missing encryption
Medium5.4EPSS 0.09%, higher than 0% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-311
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where encrypted (HTTPS) communication was not enforced for all requests. Data may be transmitted over unencrypted connections and intercepted by an attacker on the network, potentially resulting in unintended behavior or security impact…
HCL AION vulnerability
Low3.7EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 3.7CWE-535
HCL AION is affected by a vulnerability where pages served over HTTPS could be cached by the browser or intermediate proxies. Sensitive information in cached responses may be retrieved by an unauthorized user with access to the cache, potentially resulting in unintended…
HCL AION open redirect
Medium4.7EPSS 0.25%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-601
HCL AION is affected by an open redirect vulnerability in the user menu of the GenAI web interface (UserMenu component). The redirect to the login page on logout used a URL taken from build configuration (NEXT_PUBLIC_LOGIN_URL) without validating the redirect destination. This…
HCL AION open redirect
Medium4.7EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-601
HCL AION is affected by an open redirect vulnerability in the session-handling logic of the GenAI web interface (UserContext component, line 89). A second redirect to the login page in this component used a URL taken from build configuration (NEXT_PUBLIC_LOGIN_URL) without…
HCL AION open redirect
Medium4.7EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-601
HCL AION is affected by an open redirect vulnerability in the session-handling logic of the GenAI web interface (UserContext component, line 78). The redirect to the login page used a URL taken from build configuration (NEXT_PUBLIC_LOGIN_URL) without validating the redirect…
HCL AION open redirect
Medium4.7EPSS 0.23%, higher than 13% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-601
HCL AION is affected by an open redirect vulnerability on the user registration page (Signup component). The redirect performed after registration used the value of the 'redirect' query parameter without validation, so a crafted registration link could send a user to an…
HCL AION open redirect
Medium4.7EPSS 0.23%, higher than 13% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-601
HCL AION is affected by an open redirect vulnerability on the role assignment pending page (RoleAssignPending component). The redirect to the login page used a URL taken from build configuration (NEXT_PUBLIC_LOGIN_URL) without validating the redirect destination. This may be…
HCL AION open redirect
Medium4.7EPSS 0.30%, higher than 24% of scored CVEsHCL AIONCVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-601
HCL AION is affected by an open redirect vulnerability in the navigation bar of the GenAI web interface (Navbar component). The switch-version action redirected the browser to a dynamically constructed URL (window origin + '/workspace') without validating the redirect…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.