Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 06:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,410 CVEs published, 389 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 2 | 37 | 26 | 1 | 22 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet599
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)403
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)296
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)189
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)183
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)163
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)157
- Path traversal (CWE-22)148
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
7,165 CVEs match these filters, page 185 of 287.
tox-dev filelock vulnerability
Medium5.8EPSS 0.11%, higher than 1% of scored CVEstox-dev filelockCVSS 3.1 · 5.8CWE-363
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.30.0 until 4.2.1, On POSIX platforms, StrictSoftFileLock and AsyncStrictSoftFileLock validate the coordination directory in _ensure_protocol_directory but later reach the claims directory through _open_directory by…
tox-dev filelock time-of-check to time-of-use race
Low3.3EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEstox-dev filelockCVSS 3.1 · 3.3CWE-367
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.20.4 until 4.2.1, ReadWriteLock and AsyncReadWriteLock on Windows use _connect to attach SQLite to the lock database by pathname, allowing another local account that can create adjacent names to place a…
tox-dev filelock incorrect permission assignment
Medium5.3EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEstox-dev filelockCVSS 3.1 · 5.3CWE-732
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.10.0 until 4.2.1, filelock on Windows ignores the mode argument for WindowsFileLock files and the ReadWriteLock SQLite database. A lock created with mode=0o600 receives the parent directory's inheritable ACL…
tox-dev filelock incorrect permission assignment
Medium5.3EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEstox-dev filelockCVSS 3.1 · 5.3CWE-732
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From version 3.30.0 until version 4.2.1, StrictSoftFileLock and AsyncStrictSoftFileLock on POSIX systems create coordination and claim directories without applying the caller’s restrictive lock mode. A permissive umask or…
tox-dev filelock vulnerability
Low2.5EPSS 0.10%, higher than 1% of scored CVEstox-dev filelockCVSS 3.1 · 2.5CWE-667
filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, soft lock classes on Windows read an existing marker with _read_lock_file and remove a stale marker through break_lock_file using pathname operations that wait for an oplock break. Another local…
modelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk race condition
High7.7EPSS 0.37%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsmodelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.7CWE-362
The Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK provides TypeScript client and server implementations of the Model Context Protocol. From 2.0.0 until 2.3.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/server, applications that shared one stateless HTTP transport or one McpServer or Server instance among…
modelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk information exposure
Medium6.5EPSS 0.40%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsmodelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-200
The Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK provides TypeScript client and server implementations of the Model Context Protocol. Prior to 1.32.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk and from 2.0.0 until 2.3.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/client, the HTTP client transports and OAuth client…
modelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk allocation without limits
High7.5EPSS 0.60%, higher than 49% of scored CVEsmodelcontextprotocol typescript-sdk and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-770
The Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK provides TypeScript client and server implementations of the Model Context Protocol. From 1.3.0 until 1.32.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk and from 2.0.0 until 2.3.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/server, HTTP servers did not enforce a limit…
TPC Software Matchpoint cleartext storage of sensitive data
Medium5.1EPSS 0.10%, higher than 1% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 5.1CWE-312
API keys, credentials, and configuration parameters embedded in the MatchPoint APK, which can be extracted through reverse engineering. The vendor distinguishes the extracted elements from Google Maps and Firebase keys that must remain on the client side and considers them…
TPC Software Matchpoint improper certificate validation
Critical9.1EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 9.1CWE-295
Incorrect validation of TLS certificates in the MatchPoint Android app due to a TrustManager that accepts any certificate and a permissive hostname validator. Additionally, the app allows unencrypted HTTP traffic. An attacker capable of intercepting the victim's traffic could…
TPC Software Matchpoint missing authentication
High8.7EPSS 0.48%, higher than 42% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 8.7CWE-306
Lack of authentication and authorization in the Images.ashx endpoint in MatchPoint, which allows profile photos to be downloaded using predictable identifiers. An unauthenticated remote attacker could enumerate these identifiers and collect users' photos. Linking these photos…
TPC Software Matchpoint SQL injection
High8.6EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-89
SQL injection in the push notification handler of the MatchPoint Android app, which processes messages from Firebase Cloud Messaging and constructs queries by concatenating untrusted data. An attacker capable of interacting with the component could manipulate queries and access…
TPC Software Matchpoint plaintext password storage
Medium6.9EPSS 0.12%, higher than 2% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 6.9CWE-256
Credentials are stored in plain text in an SQLite database and in the MatchPoint Android app's SharedPreferences. An attacker with access to the device's local data or a backup could retrieve usernames and passwords and use them to gain unauthorized access to accounts on the…
TPC Software Matchpoint insecure direct object reference
Critical9.9EPSS 0.38%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 9.9CWE-639
Insecure direct object reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the MatchPoint API, which relies on the `actingasuser` HTTP header without verifying the requester's authorization for the specified user. Manipulation of sequential identifiers allows access to personal, banking, and…
TPC Software Matchpoint hard-coded credentials
Critical9.9EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEsTPC Software MatchpointCVSS 4.0 · 9.9CWE-798
A static credential embedded in the mobile app has been reported to return the 'autorizado' token on the MatchPoint platform. The report states that this token grants unauthenticated access to API services.
lxc link following
Medium6.8EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEslxcCVSS 4.0 · 6.8CWE-59, CWE-61
LXC is a userspace interface for the Linux kernel containment features used to create and manage system containers. In LXC 7.0.0 and earlier, lxc-copy and the public liblxc clone() API can follow attacker-controlled symbolic links while updating /etc/hostname in a copied…
vitali87 code-graph-rag path traversal
High7.1EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEsvitali87 code-graph-ragCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-22, CWE-59
Code Graph RAG is an AI-powered knowledge graph and retrieval system for querying, understanding, and editing multi-language codebases. Prior to 0.0.589, AstGrepService in codebase_rag/tools/ast_grep_service.py enumerates files beneath project_root and relies on…
jhuckaby Cronicle incorrect authorization
Critical9.0EPSS 0.40%, higher than 35% of scored CVEsjhuckaby CronicleCVSS 4.0 · 9.0CWE-74, CWE-863
Cronicle is a multi-server task scheduler and runner, with a web based front-end UI. Prior to 0.9.124, an authenticated non-admin with run_events, create_events, or edit_events privilege can supply undeclared keys in event params through api_create_event, api_update_event, or…
kurrent-io KurrentDB external control of a file name
Medium6.9EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEskurrent-io KurrentDBCVSS 4.0 · 6.9CWE-73, CWE-918
KurrentDB is a database engineered for modern software applications and event-driven architectures. In version 26.1.0, a user authorized to read the $all stream can use Secondary Indexing query capabilities to read arbitrary files accessible to the database process, enumerate…
BishopFox sliver allocation without limits
High8.2EPSS 0.53%, higher than 46% of scored CVEsBishopFox sliverCVSS 4.0 · 8.2CWE-770
Sliver is a command and control framework. Prior to 1.7.6, an HTTP(S) listener using the PNG encoder accepts attacker-controlled PNG dimensions without an effective decoded-size or pixel limit in util/encoders/images.go, while the listener nonce space implemented in…
umputun remark42 use of a less trusted source
Medium6.5EPSS 0.22%, higher than 13% of scored CVEsumputun remark42CVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-348, CWE-807
Remark42 is a self-hosted comment engine for blogs, articles, or any other place where readers can add comments. From 1.0.0 until 1.16.2, Remark42 globally trusts True-Client-IP, X-Real-IP, and X-Forwarded-For without verifying that the direct peer is a trusted proxy, and…
borgbackup borg link following
Medium5.3EPSS 0.16%, higher than 5% of scored CVEsborgbackup borgCVSS 4.0 · 5.3CWE-59
borgbackup is an opensource, deduplicating archiver with compression and authenticated encryption. Prior to 1.4.5 and 2.0.0b22, extracting a malicious archive can follow a symlinked parent path or resolve embedded dot-dot path components and delete or overwrite files outside…
caddyserver caddy HTTP request smuggling
Low2.9EPSS 0.50%, higher than 43% of scored CVEscaddyserver caddyCVSS 4.0 · 2.9CWE-444
Caddy is an extensible server platform that uses TLS by default. Prior to 2.11.5, the reverse proxy's finalizeResponse method in modules/caddyhttp/reverseproxy/reverseproxy.go handles an upstream 101 Switching Protocols response before running removeConnectionHeaders and the…
NationalSecurityAgency emissary server-side request forgery
Medium4.8EPSS 0.35%, higher than 29% of scored CVEsNationalSecurityAgency emissaryCVSS 3.1 · 4.8CWE-918
Emissary is a P2P based data-driven workflow engine. Prior to 8.51.0, the VALID_LINK validation in src/main/java/emissary/server/mvc/NavAction.java accepts protocol-relative URLs when processing configured navigation links. Browser URL normalization can interpret these accepted…
oauthlib improper authentication
High8.5EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsoauthlibCVSS 3.1 · 8.5CWE-287
OAuthLib is an implementation of the OAuth request-signing logic for Python 3.6+. From 3.3.0 until 4.0.1, OAuthLib's RFC 8628 device workflow does not require DeviceCodeGrant.validate_token_request to check that the device_code parameter is present and valid. A caller whose…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.