Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 13 Nov, 17:15 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 11%, higher than 96% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 9.1%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 9 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
6,287 CVEs published, 490 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 142 | 29 | 0 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 149 | 36 | 0 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 148 | 203 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 54 | 164 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 31 | 165 | 231 | 42 | 1 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 117 | 1216 | 621 | 61 | 99 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 51 | 285 | 237 | 44 | 47 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 28 | 172 | 129 | 23 | 6 |
| 13 Nov 2026 | 50 | 249 | 247 | 42 | 25 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%5904
- 1% to 10%217
- 10% to 50%4
- 50% or more4
- Not scored yet158
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)493
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)371
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)362
- Use after free (CWE-416)340
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)222
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)202
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)199
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)179
- Path traversal (CWE-22)177
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)177
Matching CVEs
9 CVEs match these filters.
RT-Labs P-Net null pointer dereference
Medium6.0EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 6.0CWE-476
P-Net before 1.0.4 aborts the Application Relationship of an RPC session when a fragment of a response has been resent without being acknowledged, without checking that the session has an Application Relationship. A request for an existing Application Relationship that is sent…
RT-Labs P-Net resource never released
High7.1EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-772
P-Net before 1.0.4 keeps the RPC session that is allocated for a fragment of a request with an unknown activity UUID, without a timeout, when the rest of the request never arrives. A session that does not get an Application Relationship is also kept after the response. Repeated…
RT-Labs P-Net improper resource shutdown
Medium6.0EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 6.0CWE-404
P-Net before 1.0.4 releases the Application Relationship of an RPC session, without the abort procedure, when a fragment of a request has another data representation (endianness) than the first fragment of the call. The application is not told that the Application Relationship…
RT-Labs P-Net out-of-bounds write
High7.2EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 7.2CWE-787
P-Net before 1.0.4 does not check the number of MCR request blocks in a Connect request against the number of multicast communication relations that an Application Relationship has room for (PNET_MAX_MC_CR, 1 by default). Each further block is written past the end of the array,…
RT-Labs P-Net origin validation error
Medium6.0EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 6.0CWE-346
P-Net before 1.0.4 finds the RPC session of a received PDU by its activity UUID only, and a reject, fault or cancel PDU for the session aborts the Application Relationship, without checking that the PDU is the answer to a call of the device or where it comes from. A host with…
RT-Labs P-Net vulnerability
High7.1EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-696
P-Net before 1.0.4 copies the IP suite of a DCP Set request to the current and the non-volatile configuration, and starts saving it, before the state of the device is checked. If the request is refused, for example because an Application Relationship is active, the…
RT-Labs P-Net unchecked unusual condition
Low2.3EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 2.3CWE-754
P-Net before 1.0.4 sets the alarm receiver state to waiting for confirmation before the data of a received alarm notification is parsed. If the parsing fails the state is not restored, and later alarm notifications of the same priority are discarded without acknowledge until…
RT-Labs P-Net origin validation error
High7.1EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 7.1CWE-346
P-Net before 1.0.4 routes a received RTA alarm frame to an Application Relationship using only the destination alarm reference in the frame, without checking the source of the frame. A host with ADJACENT network access can abort an established Application Relationship with a…
RT-Labs P-Net integer underflow
Low2.3EPSS not scored yetRT-Labs P-NetCVSS 4.0 · 2.3CWE-191
P-Net before 1.0.4 does not check the record data length of an IODWrite request to a non-user record index against the size of the record block header. The 32-bit length is reduced by the header size before it is passed to the record handlers, so a length smaller than the…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.