Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 11 Nov, 04:49 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS not scored yetGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 1.1%, higher than 65% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
4,691 CVEs published, 346 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1151 | 587 | 43 | 233 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 2 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 0 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%713
- 1% to 10%25
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more7
- Not scored yet3944
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)343
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)329
- Use after free (CWE-416)276
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)230
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)172
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)164
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)147
- Path traversal (CWE-22)128
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)127
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)127
Matching CVEs
337 CVEs match these filters, page 12 of 14.
Apache Juneau sensitive data in logs
Critical10.0EPSS 0.43%, higher than 37% of scored CVEsApache JuneauCVSS 4.0 · 10.0CWE-532
Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File vulnerability in Apache Juneau. The default REST server call logger records request headers for requests that end in a server error, without redacting them. Any client able to cause a server error gets headers such as…
Apache Juneau cross-site request forgery
Critical10.0EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsApache JuneauCVSS 4.0 · 10.0CWE-352
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache Juneau. The REST server accepts a "content" query parameter that replaces the request body, and this is enabled by default on every HTTP method, including GET. A cross-site link can therefore deliver an attacker-chosen…
Apache Juneau unsafe reflection
Critical10.0EPSS 0.46%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsApache JuneauCVSS 4.0 · 10.0CWE-470
Improper control of dynamically-loaded code vulnerability in Apache Juneau. When Apache Juneau parses a value into a property of type java.lang.Class (including parameterized forms), the default class swap loaded the named class with initialization enabled, so input naming a…
Apache Juneau path traversal
Critical10.0EPSS 0.50%, higher than 43% of scored CVEsApache JuneauCVSS 4.0 · 10.0CWE-22
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Juneau. The microservice DirectoryResource does not keep request paths inside its configured root directory. When an application enables the resource's view, upload or delete…
Security For WooCommerce missing authorization
Critical9.8EPSS 0.37%, higher than 31% of scored CVEsSecurity For WooCommerceCVSS 3.0 · 9.8CWE-862
The Security For WooCommerce WordPress plugin from 1.0.10 to 1.0.16 does not perform capability checks when creating users through an action available to unauthenticated visitors, and lets the caller choose the new account's role, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create…
OPNsense os-acme-client OS command injection
Critical9.4EPSS 0.63%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOPNsense os-acme-clientCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-78
An OS Command Injection vulnerability was discovered in the Google Cloud DNS validation module of the OPNsense os-acme-client plugin through 4.17. The DnsGcloud::prepare() method decodes the dns_gcloud_key model field and directly interpolates the string fields gcloud_account…
All In One Login improper privilege management
Critical9.8EPSS 0.28%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsAll In One LoginCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-269
The All In One Login WordPress plugin before 2.5.0 does not adequately restrict the number of attempts that can be made against the short numeric code used by its default-enabled passwordless email login, and does not feed those failed attempts into its own brute-force…
IVPAY payments SQL injection
Critical9.3EPSS 0.26%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsIVPAY paymentsCVSS 3.1 · 9.3CWE-89
The IVPAY payments WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not sanitise a value from its payment callback before using it in a SQL statement, and treats an empty API key, which is its own default, as valid authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary data…
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos Modem 5300 out-of-bounds write
Critical9.1EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos Modem 5300 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-787
Insufficient length validation in the GNSS firmware loader may lead to corruption of kernel memory.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-787
Out-of-bounds memory access in a device driver due to improper resource state tracking.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 2200 use after free
Critical9.1EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 2200 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-416
In the Samsung Exynos GPU driver, improper synchronization during buffer object creation and closing can lead to memory corruption
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 unchecked unusual condition
Critical9.1EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-754
Insufficient validation of length fields in the GNSS firmware loader can result in kernel‑memory corruption.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 out-of-bounds write
Critical9.8EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-787
In the Samsung Exynos ENN NeuralNetworks HAL, improper input validation during request processing can cause memory corruption and lead to a denial of service condition.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 unchecked unusual condition
Critical9.1EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-754
Improper handling of messages before AS security activation can cause unexpected behavior
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 vulnerability
Critical9.1EPSS 0.13%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-281
Improper permission handling during buffer operations allows untrusted applications to create memory mappings with inappropriate permissions
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 null pointer dereference
Critical9.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 and 8 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-476
In the NR RRC component, improper handling of messages before authentication triggers a data abort, which leads to a denial‑of‑service condition.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 classic buffer overflow
Critical9.8EPSS 0.14%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-120
In the NAS message handler, improper validation of the length field in NAS message causes memory corruption
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 unchecked quantity
Critical9.8EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-1284
In the Exynos modem's IMS stack, Out of Bound access occurs due to improper validation.
Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 uncontrolled resource consumption
Critical9.8EPSS 0.18%, higher than 8% of scored CVEsSamsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-400
In the LTE RRC component, improper handling of messages before authentication triggers a data abort, which leads to a denial‑of‑service condition.
G4KLX DStarGateway integer underflow
Critical9.2EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEsG4KLX DStarGatewayCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-191
In G4KLX DStarGateway and F4FXL DStarGateway before 7b75de6, dstarCallsignToAPRS in APRSUtils.cpp has an integer underflow via an empty RS-MS1A sender field.
kyverno improper privilege management
Critical9.4EPSS 0.31%, higher than 24% of scored CVEskyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-269
Kyverno from 1.17.0 before 1.19.2 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows namespace-scoped tenants to modify resources in other namespaces through NamespacedMutatingPolicy targetMatchConstraints.expression CEL output lacking namespace checks. Attackers can…
kyverno path traversal
Critical9.4EPSS 0.45%, higher than 39% of scored CVEskyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-22
Kyverno from 1.16.0 before 1.19.2 fails to validate path segments in the resource argument of resource.get() and resource.post(), allowing namespaced CEL policies to escape their namespace. Tenants who can create a NamespacedValidatingPolicy can insert .. segments to read and…
kyverno interpretation conflict
Critical9.4EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEskyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-436
Kyverno from 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 validates a Policy's context.apiCall urlPath after cleaning it but executes the raw path, whose fragment or query the Kubernetes client discards. A namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy can hide ../ segments behind # or ? to reach…
kyverno incorrect authorization
Critical9.4EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEskyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-863
Kyverno from 1.17.0 before 1.19.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows namespace admins to escape namespace confinement because the cleanup controller builds its context loader with a nil policy. Attackers can create a namespaced CleanupPolicy with apiCall…
kyverno missing authorization
Critical9.4EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEskyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-862
Kyverno from 1.17.0 before 1.19.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows namespace tenants to overwrite resources in other namespaces via NamespacedMutatingPolicy mutate-existing targetMatchConstraints.expression. Attackers can return a CEL map literal…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.