Skip to main content
veriom
Menu

Explore Veriom products, resources, and account pages.

Free tool · No sign-in

CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.

Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.

Updated 12 Nov, 02:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed

344Critical, last 7 days2,178High, last 7 days40Added to CISA KEV, 30 days1,779Exploited CVEs tracked

Patch first

Exploited in the wild, newest first.

CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.

  1. CVE-2026-124194

    Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability

    Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEs

    Microsoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356

  2. CVE-2026-125350

    Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability

    High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEs

    Google Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416

  3. CVE-2026-116606

    Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability

    Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEs

    Barracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288

  4. CVE-2026-111560

    Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability

    High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEs

    Barracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78

  5. CVE-2026-111793

    Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability

    Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEs

    Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669

Every exploited CVE

Trends

The last 30 days, by severity.

5,328 CVEs published, 388 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.

CriticalHighMediumLowNot scored14 Oct 2026 to 12 Nov 2026
Show the numbers
DayCriticalHighMediumLowNot scored
14 Oct 202622000
15 Oct 202612000
16 Oct 202600100
17 Oct 202600000
18 Oct 202600000
19 Oct 202600000
20 Oct 202600000
21 Oct 202620000
22 Oct 202620000
23 Oct 202600000
24 Oct 202600000
25 Oct 202600000
26 Oct 202600000
27 Oct 202600000
28 Oct 202601000
29 Oct 202600000
30 Oct 202600000
31 Oct 202601000
1 Nov 202600000
2 Nov 202611000
3 Nov 202600100
4 Nov 202635158138321
5 Nov 202655213148361
6 Nov 202640146205476
7 Nov 2026571612321113
8 Nov 202623128143260
9 Nov 2026221492184239
10 Nov 2026103115059043230
11 Nov 20264423322134132
12 Nov 202610401

Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days

  1. Under 1%4630
  2. 1% to 10%174
  3. 10% to 50%2
  4. 50% or more5
  5. Not scored yet517

Most affected vendors, last 30 days

  1. Microsoft1095
  2. IBM322
  3. Google250
  4. Apache Software Foundation187
  5. FFmpeg121
  6. Adobe112
  7. Mozilla108
  8. Fortinet98
  9. Red Hat95
  10. JetBrains89

Matching CVEs

345 CVEs match these filters, page 14 of 14.

  1. CVE-2026-100144

    IVPAY payments SQL injection

    Critical9.3EPSS 0.26%, higher than 17% of scored CVEs

    IVPAY paymentsCVSS 3.1 · 9.3CWE-89

    The IVPAY payments WordPress plugin through 1.0.8 does not sanitise a value from its payment callback before using it in a SQL statement, and treats an empty API key, which is its own default, as valid authentication, allowing unauthenticated attackers to read arbitrary data…

  2. CVE-2026-69068

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos Modem 5300 out-of-bounds write

    Critical9.1EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos Modem 5300 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-787

    Insufficient length validation in the GNSS firmware loader may lead to corruption of kernel memory.

  3. CVE-2026-69050

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 out-of-bounds write

    Critical9.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-787

    Out-of-bounds memory access in a device driver due to improper resource state tracking.

  4. CVE-2026-69043

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 2200 use after free

    Critical9.1EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 2200 and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-416

    In the Samsung Exynos GPU driver, improper synchronization during buffer object creation and closing can lead to memory corruption

  5. CVE-2026-69006

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 unchecked unusual condition

    Critical9.1EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-754

    Insufficient validation of length fields in the GNSS firmware loader can result in kernel‑memory corruption.

  6. CVE-2026-68991

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 out-of-bounds write

    Critical9.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-787

    In the Samsung Exynos ENN NeuralNetworks HAL, improper input validation during request processing can cause memory corruption and lead to a denial of service condition.

  7. CVE-2026-48186

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 unchecked unusual condition

    Critical9.1EPSS 0.26%, higher than 18% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-754

    Improper handling of messages before AS security activation can cause unexpected behavior

  8. CVE-2026-48183

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 vulnerability

    Critical9.1EPSS 0.24%, higher than 16% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1480 and 5 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.1CWE-281

    Improper permission handling during buffer operations allows untrusted applications to create memory mappings with inappropriate permissions

  9. CVE-2026-48174

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 null pointer dereference

    Critical9.8EPSS 0.33%, higher than 27% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1280 and 8 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-476

    In the NR RRC component, improper handling of messages before authentication triggers a data abort, which leads to a denial‑of‑service condition.

  10. CVE-2026-48173

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 classic buffer overflow

    Critical9.8EPSS 0.29%, higher than 22% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-120

    In the NAS message handler, improper validation of the length field in NAS message causes memory corruption

  11. CVE-2026-33972

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 unchecked quantity

    Critical9.8EPSS 0.36%, higher than 30% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 1080 and 4 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-1284

    In the Exynos modem's IMS stack, Out of Bound access occurs due to improper validation.

  12. CVE-2026-33971

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 uncontrolled resource consumption

    Critical9.8EPSS 0.41%, higher than 36% of scored CVEs

    Samsung Semiconductor Exynos 850 and 9 moreCVSS 3.1 · 9.8CWE-400

    In the LTE RRC component, improper handling of messages before authentication triggers a data abort, which leads to a denial‑of‑service condition.

  13. CVE-2026-122992

    G4KLX DStarGateway integer underflow

    Critical9.2EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEs

    G4KLX DStarGatewayCVSS 4.0 · 9.2CWE-191

    In G4KLX DStarGateway and F4FXL DStarGateway before 7b75de6, dstarCallsignToAPRS in APRSUtils.cpp has an integer underflow via an empty RS-MS1A sender field.

  14. CVE-2026-122313

    kyverno improper privilege management

    Critical9.4EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEs

    kyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-269

    Kyverno from 1.17.0 before 1.19.2 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows namespace-scoped tenants to modify resources in other namespaces through NamespacedMutatingPolicy targetMatchConstraints.expression CEL output lacking namespace checks. Attackers can…

  15. CVE-2026-122311

    kyverno path traversal

    Critical9.4EPSS 0.46%, higher than 41% of scored CVEs

    kyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-22

    Kyverno from 1.16.0 before 1.19.2 fails to validate path segments in the resource argument of resource.get() and resource.post(), allowing namespaced CEL policies to escape their namespace. Tenants who can create a NamespacedValidatingPolicy can insert .. segments to read and…

  16. CVE-2026-122310

    kyverno interpretation conflict

    Critical9.4EPSS 0.37%, higher than 31% of scored CVEs

    kyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-436

    Kyverno from 1.19.1 before 1.19.2 validates a Policy's context.apiCall urlPath after cleaning it but executes the raw path, whose fragment or query the Kubernetes client discards. A namespace-scoped user who can create a Policy can hide ../ segments behind # or ? to reach…

  17. CVE-2026-122304

    kyverno incorrect authorization

    Critical9.4EPSS 0.39%, higher than 34% of scored CVEs

    kyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-863

    Kyverno from 1.17.0 before 1.19.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows namespace admins to escape namespace confinement because the cleanup controller builds its context loader with a nil policy. Attackers can create a namespaced CleanupPolicy with apiCall…

  18. CVE-2026-122303

    kyverno missing authorization

    Critical9.4EPSS 0.32%, higher than 25% of scored CVEs

    kyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.4CWE-862

    Kyverno from 1.17.0 before 1.19.2 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows namespace tenants to overwrite resources in other namespaces via NamespacedMutatingPolicy mutate-existing targetMatchConstraints.expression. Attackers can return a CEL map literal…

  19. CVE-2026-122302

    kyverno improper privilege management

    Critical9.3EPSS 0.28%, higher than 21% of scored CVEs

    kyvernoCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-269

    Kyverno before 1.19.2 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows namespace admins to create resources beyond their RBAC because generate-rule admission checks verify the controller's permissions, not the author's. Attackers can create a namespaced Policy with…

  20. CVE-2026-122051

    Edimax BR-6208AC command injection

    Critical9.3EPSS 2.6%, higher than 85% of scored CVEs

    Edimax BR-6208ACCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-74, CWE-77

    A flaw has been found in Edimax BR-6208AC 1.32. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /goform/mp. Executing a manipulation can lead to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The…

Reading the radar

CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.

What is a CVE?

A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.

What does the CVSS score tell me?

CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.

What is CISA KEV?

The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.

What is EPSS?

FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.

How should I prioritise?

Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.

Where do the explanations come from?

Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.

How fresh is the data?

New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.

Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.

A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.

See how Veriom maps an architectureTake the interactive tour

Sources

  • CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
  • Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
  • Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
  • Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.