Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 04:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,387 CVEs published, 389 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 2 | 35 | 26 | 1 | 1 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet576
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)402
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)296
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)189
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)183
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)163
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)157
- Path traversal (CWE-22)148
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
7,142 CVEs match these filters, page 170 of 286.
freescout-help-desk freescout cross-site scripting
High7.6EPSS 0.21%, higher than 12% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 7.6CWE-79
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.225, a user who can edit a mailbox signature can combine a scriptable file uploaded through /uploads/upload with nested tag fragments that bypass Helper::stripDangerousTags(). The resulting external script is…
freescout-help-desk freescout insecure direct object reference
Medium6.5EPSS 0.23%, higher than 14% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-200, CWE-639
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.226, RealtimeConvNewThread checks only general mailbox access and does not apply the conversation-level restriction for users configured to see only assigned conversations. A restricted authenticated user can…
freescout-help-desk freescout insecure direct object reference
Medium4.3EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-200, CWE-639
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.226, the search-by-number shortcut in ConversationsController::search() resolves a user-controlled ticket number without applying the mailbox filter or view policy used by the normal search path. An…
freescout-help-desk freescout improper authentication
Medium5.3EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 5.3CWE-287, CWE-307
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.225, the administrative tools.php maintenance endpoint is reachable without an appropriate authentication or access-control boundary. Response differences for attacker-controlled path values disclose whether…
infiniflow ragflow server-side request forgery
Medium5.3EPSS 0.25%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsinfiniflow ragflowCVSS 4.0 · 5.3CWE-918
RAGFlow before 0.27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to force the server to issue requests to arbitrary internal or external endpoints by supplying an unvalidated base_url to the POST /v1/llm/set_api_key endpoint handled…
Debian FreedomBox UNIX symbolic link following
High8.4EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsDebian FreedomBoxCVSS 3.1 · 8.4CWE-61
In FreedomBox before 26.15, unprivileged user accounts can read/write files for which they lack permissions by setting the authorized_keys file to be a symlink. NOTE: FreedomBox is a Debian Pure Blend, which means that it distributes its software through Debian repositories.
Snowflake Connector for Python SQL injection
High8.1EPSS 0.37%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsSnowflake Connector for Python and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.1CWE-89
When identifier escaping is disabled through a non-default configuration, the write_pandas() data-loading functionality in the Snowflake Connector for Python and the Snowflake Connector for Python (Universal Core) did not escape DataFrame column names before including them in…
JetBrains PhpStorm inclusion of untrusted functionality
Medium4.4EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsJetBrains PhpStormCVSS 3.1 · 4.4CWE-829
In JetBrains PhpStorm before 2026.3 project files could be automatically uploaded to a deployment server from untrusted projects
JetBrains PhpStorm XML external entity
Medium4.3EPSS 0.26%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsJetBrains PhpStormCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-611
In JetBrains PhpStorm before 2026.3 xXE was possible in untrusted projects via PHPMD ruleset autodetection
JetBrains Toolbox App insufficiently protected credentials
Medium6.5EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEsJetBrains Toolbox AppCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-522
In JetBrains Toolbox App before 3.6.1 nTLM hash disclosure was possible via SVG tool icons from a Remote Development server
JetBrains Toolbox App OS command injection
High7.5EPSS 0.68%, higher than 53% of scored CVEsJetBrains Toolbox AppCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-78
In JetBrains Toolbox App before 3.6.1 command injection was possible via enterprise configuration URLs
JetBrains PyCharm inclusion of untrusted functionality
Medium5.5EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsJetBrains PyCharmCVSS 3.1 · 5.5CWE-829
In JetBrains PyCharm before 2026.3 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via a crafted Jupyter notebook widget module
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.2 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via project-controlled JVM options of the build process
JetBrains Junie GitHub Action incorrect authorization
High7.4EPSS 0.38%, higher than 32% of scored CVEsJetBrains Junie GitHub ActionCVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-863
In JetBrains Junie GitHub Action before 1.8.0 code execution with workflow credentials was possible via fork updates
JetBrains Junie GitHub Action vulnerability
Medium5.4EPSS 0.25%, higher than 16% of scored CVEsJetBrains Junie GitHub ActionCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-180
In JetBrains Junie GitHub Action before 1.6.4 prompt injection protection could be bypassed via HTML-encoded characters
JetBrains YouTrack clickjacking
Low3.5EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEsJetBrains YouTrackCVSS 3.1 · 3.5CWE-1021
In JetBrains YouTrack before 2026.2.19422 cSS injection was possible in Mermaid diagrams via configuration directives
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.0EPSS 0.14%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.0CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in untrusted projects via the Terraform File Watchers
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA vulnerability
High7.4EPSS 0.20%, higher than 10% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.4CWE-297
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 host name verification was missing for server TLS certificates
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA vulnerability
Medium5.3EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 5.3CWE-150
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 command execution was possible via control characters in terminal command completion
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA server-side request forgery
Medium4.3EPSS 0.26%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-918
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 blind SSRF was possible via remote references in JSON Schema validation
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA relative path traversal
Low3.3EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 3.3CWE-23
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 path traversal was possible via JSON Schema references in untrusted projects
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA server-side request forgery
Medium5.3EPSS 0.27%, higher than 20% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 5.3CWE-918
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 sSRF was possible via custom plugin repositories
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
Low3.3EPSS 0.15%, higher than 4% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 3.3CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 untrusted projects could trigger changes to GPG agent configuration
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA link following
High7.1EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-59
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 arbitrary file write was possible via symlinks when extracting plugin archives
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA link following
High7.8EPSS 0.19%, higher than 9% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-59
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible via symlinks in an imported settings archive
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.