Free tool · No sign-in
CVE radar: the latest vulnerabilities, explained.
Every new CVE from NVD, with whether it is exploited in the wild (CISA KEV), how likely it is to be (FIRST EPSS), and what it means for your architecture in plain language.
Updated 12 Nov, 04:28 UTC from NVD, CISA KEV and FIRST EPSSMarkdownRSSJSON Feed
Patch first
Exploited in the wild, newest first.
CISA adds a CVE to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog when attackers are using it. Patch these first, then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe, starting with anything reachable from the internet.
Microsoft Office Outlook Missing User Interaction for Potentially Unsafe Action Vulnerability
Medium6.5Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsMicrosoft Office and 6 moreCVSS 3.1 · 6.5CWE-356
Google Chromium Use-After-Free Vulnerability
High8.8Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.96%, higher than 62% of scored CVEsGoogle Chromium and 1 moreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-416
Barracuda Networks Email Security Gateway (ESG) Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel Vulnerability
Critical9.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 8.9%, higher than 95% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG)CVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-288
Barracuda Networks Multiple Products OS Command Injection Vulnerability
High8.6Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-13EPSS 6.2%, higher than 94% of scored CVEsBarracuda Email Security Gateway (ESG) and 5 moreCVSS 4.0 · 8.6CWE-78
Openwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder Incorrect Resource Transfer Between Spheres Vulnerability
Medium4.3Exploited, CISA due date 2026-11-24EPSS 0.64%, higher than 51% of scored CVEsOpenwave Messaging Limited Webtop Media Transcoder and 2 moreCVSS 3.1 · 4.3CWE-669
Trends
The last 30 days, by severity.
5,387 CVEs published, 389 of them critical. Many arrive without a score yet: NVD and the reporting organisations add CVSS over the following days.
Show the numbers
| Day | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Not scored |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 Oct 2026 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2026 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 Oct 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 Oct 2026 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 Nov 2026 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 Nov 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 Nov 2026 | 35 | 158 | 138 | 32 | 1 |
| 5 Nov 2026 | 55 | 213 | 148 | 36 | 1 |
| 6 Nov 2026 | 40 | 146 | 205 | 47 | 6 |
| 7 Nov 2026 | 57 | 161 | 232 | 11 | 13 |
| 8 Nov 2026 | 23 | 128 | 143 | 26 | 0 |
| 9 Nov 2026 | 22 | 149 | 218 | 42 | 39 |
| 10 Nov 2026 | 103 | 1150 | 590 | 43 | 230 |
| 11 Nov 2026 | 44 | 233 | 221 | 34 | 132 |
| 12 Nov 2026 | 2 | 35 | 26 | 1 | 1 |
Exploit likelihood (EPSS), last 30 days
- Under 1%4630
- 1% to 10%174
- 10% to 50%2
- 50% or more5
- Not scored yet576
Most affected vendors, last 30 days
Most common weaknesses, last 30 days
- Cross-site scripting (CWE-79)402
- Heap-based buffer overflow (CWE-122)353
- Use after free (CWE-416)312
- Missing authorization (CWE-862)296
- Insecure direct object reference (CWE-639)189
- Out-of-bounds read (CWE-125)183
- Server-side request forgery (CWE-918)163
- Incorrect authorization (CWE-863)157
- Path traversal (CWE-22)148
- Out-of-bounds write (CWE-787)146
Matching CVEs
7,142 CVEs match these filters, page 171 of 286.
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA cross-site scripting
Medium4.7EPSS 0.20%, higher than 10% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-80
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 hTML injection was possible in Remote Development editor tabs
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA vulnerability
Medium4.7EPSS 0.25%, higher than 17% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 4.7CWE-357
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 opening arbitrary URLs without confirmation was possible via the Remote Development port forwarding model
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
High7.8EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via UI Designer form file
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA OS command injection
High7.8EPSS 0.53%, higher than 45% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 7.8CWE-78
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3, 2026.2.1 command injection was possible in untrusted projects via Tomcat run configurations on WSL
JetBrains Datalore link following
High8.8EPSS 0.47%, higher than 41% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 8.8CWE-59
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 workspace collaborators could obtain the owner's SSH private key via Git backup
JetBrains Datalore time-of-check to time-of-use race
Medium5.9EPSS 0.65%, higher than 52% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 5.9CWE-367
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 code execution was possible in another user's computation via an init script upload race condition
JetBrains Datalore insecure direct object reference
High7.5EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsJetBrains DataloreCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-639
In JetBrains Datalore before 2026.4 improper scope validation in database tasks allowed using another workspace's service account
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA inclusion of untrusted functionality
Low3.6EPSS 0.13%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsJetBrains IntelliJ IDEACVSS 3.1 · 3.6CWE-829
In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.3 database connections could be established in untrusted projects
JetBrains CLion inclusion of untrusted functionality
Critical9.6EPSS 0.45%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsJetBrains CLionCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-829
In JetBrains CLion before 2026.2 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via JSON compilation database
JetBrains CLion inclusion of untrusted functionality
Critical9.6EPSS 0.45%, higher than 40% of scored CVEsJetBrains CLionCVSS 3.1 · 9.6CWE-829
In JetBrains CLion before 2026.2, 2026.1.4 code execution was possible in Safe Mode via Meson project settings
AWS trusted-remote-execution OS command injection
Critical9.3EPSS 1.6%, higher than 76% of scored CVEsAWS trusted-remote-executionCVSS 4.0 · 9.3CWE-78
OS command injection in the example SSM document provisioning script in Trusted Remote Execution (REX) before 2026-07-28 might allow an authenticated remote user who is permitted to invoke the Rex-RO or Rex-RW SSM document to execute arbitrary commands as root on the managed…
sensiolabs symfony mass assignment
Medium6.9EPSS 0.33%, higher than 26% of scored CVEssensiolabs symfonyCVSS 4.0 · 6.9CWE-915
The Symfony Serializer component ObjectNormalizer treats any attribute name containing . (and, from Symfony 6.4, [) as a writable property path, allowing untrusted input to modify properties of nested objects and bypass their #[Ignore] metadata attribute in Symfony versions…
sensiolabs symfony external control of a file name
High8.4EPSS 0.58%, higher than 48% of scored CVEssensiolabs symfonyCVSS 4.0 · 8.4CWE-73
The Symfony Serializer component DataUriNormalizer handles only the exact types SplFileInfo, SplFileObject, and File, so for a property typed with a subclass such as UploadedFile, ObjectNormalizer instantiates the object through its constructor from attacker-controlled data,…
Progress Software Kendo UI for Angular prototype pollution
Medium4.1EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for AngularCVSS 3.1 · 4.1CWE-1321
Prototype Pollution in the Scheduler component (@progress/kendo-angular-scheduler and @progress/kendo-angular-common) in Progress Software Kendo UI for Angular versions prior to 25.1.0 allows a high-privileged attacker who can control a field path processed by the Scheduler to…
Progress Software Kendo UI for Vue cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS 0.13%, higher than 3% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for VueCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the Editor component (@progress/kendo-vue-editor) in Progress Software Kendo UI for Vue versions 2.7.1 through 10.0.0 allows a low-privileged attacker who can supply Editor content to execute arbitrary JavaScript in another user's browser via an…
Progress Software KendoReact cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsProgress Software KendoReactCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the Editor component (@progress/kendo-react-editor) in Progress Software KendoReact versions 2.7.0 through 16.1.0 allows a low-privileged attacker who can supply Editor content to execute arbitrary JavaScript in another user's browser via a link…
Progress Software Kendo UI for Angular cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for AngularCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the Editor component (@progress/kendo-angular-editor) in Progress Software Kendo UI for Angular versions prior to 25.3.0 allows a low-privileged attacker who can supply Editor content to execute arbitrary JavaScript in another user's browser via a…
Progress Software KendoReact cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsProgress Software KendoReactCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the Chat component (@progress/kendo-react-conversational-ui) in Progress Software KendoReact versions 0.6.0 through 16.1.0 allows a low-privileged attacker who can supply Chat messages to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of the…
Progress Software Kendo UI for Angular cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for AngularCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the Chat component (@progress/kendo-angular-conversational-ui) in Progress Software Kendo UI for Angular versions prior to 25.3.0 allows a low-privileged attacker who can supply Chat messages to execute arbitrary JavaScript in another user's…
Progress Software KendoReact cross-site scripting
Medium5.4EPSS 0.17%, higher than 7% of scored CVEsProgress Software KendoReactCVSS 3.1 · 5.4CWE-79
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in the Menu component (@progress/kendo-react-layout) in Progress Software KendoReact versions 1.3.0 through 16.1.0 allows a low-privileged attacker who can influence the Menu item data to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the origin of the application…
Progress Software Kendo UI for Vue prototype pollution
Medium4.1EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEsProgress Software Kendo UI for VueCVSS 3.1 · 4.1CWE-1321
Prototype Pollution in @progress/kendo-vue-common in Progress Software Kendo UI for Vue versions 0.4.0 through 9.2.0 allows a high-privileged attacker who can control a field path processed by components such as the Scheduler to modify the prototype of built-in objects,…
Progress Software KendoReact prototype pollution
Medium4.1EPSS 0.21%, higher than 11% of scored CVEsProgress Software KendoReactCVSS 3.1 · 4.1CWE-1321
Prototype Pollution in the setter utility (@progress/kendo-react-common) in Progress Software KendoReact versions 3.5.0 through 16.0.0 allows a high-privileged attacker who can control a field path passed to the utility, directly or through components such as the Form,…
Progress Software Fiddler Download & Setup Skill download without integrity check
High7.5EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsProgress Software Fiddler Download & Setup SkillCVSS 3.1 · 7.5CWE-377, CWE-494
Missing integrity verification in the Progress Software Fiddler Download and Setup Skill on Linux, macOS, and Windows which allows an attacker to compromise or influence a release component and execute attacker-controlled code when a user runs the skill. On macOS, the skill…
Progress Software Progress® Telerik® Fiddler® Everywhere cross-site scripting
High7.3EPSS 0.17%, higher than 6% of scored CVEsProgress Software Progress® Telerik® Fiddler® EverywhereCVSS 3.1 · 7.3CWE-79
Improper neutralization of input in the sessions grid in Progress Telerik Fiddler Everywhere 8.3.0 and earlier allows an attacker to execute backend IPC commands by convincing a user to open a specially crafted SAZ file.
freescout-help-desk freescout improper privilege management
High7.1EPSS 0.30%, higher than 23% of scored CVEsfreescout-help-desk freescoutCVSS 3.1 · 7.1CWE-269, CWE-284
FreeScout is a self-hosted help desk and shared mailbox. Prior to 1.8.231, the profile form exposes the only_assigned_tickets permission to its non-admin owner, and UsersController::profileSave() adds or removes User::PERM_ONLY_ASSIGNED_TICKETS without checking that the editor…
Reading the radar
CVSS, KEV and EPSS, briefly.
What is a CVE?
A CVE is a public identifier for one vulnerability in one product, such as CVE-2026-59310. The CVE program assigns it; NVD, run by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology, adds scores, weakness classes and affected product lists.
What does the CVSS score tell me?
CVSS rates how severe a vulnerability is on its own, from 0 to 10, and its vector says how it is reached: over the network or locally, with or without an account, with or without someone clicking. It says nothing about whether anyone is exploiting it. The radar shows the newest CVSS version scored and names it, because version 4.0 and 3.1 scores differ.
What is CISA KEV?
The Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog is CISA's list of CVEs with reliable evidence of exploitation in the wild. US federal agencies must fix each one by its due date, and it is the strongest signal of what to patch first.
What is EPSS?
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System estimates the probability that a CVE will see exploitation activity in the next 30 days, recomputed daily. Most CVEs score well under 1%, so the radar also shows the percentile: how a CVE ranks against every scored CVE.
How should I prioritise?
Patch what CISA lists as exploited first. Then CVEs with a high EPSS score, then the most severe by CVSS. Within each group, start with whatever is reachable from the internet without an account.
Where do the explanations come from?
Veriom writes them from fixed templates over each record: the weakness class says what went wrong and where in an architecture it lives, the CVSS vector says how it is reached and what it affects, and KEV, EPSS and CISA's assessment say whether it is exploited. Nobody reviews each CVE by hand, so read the description and the references before acting.
How fresh is the data?
New and changed CVEs arrive from NVD every hour, the KEV catalog every six hours and EPSS scores once a day. Each page shows when the data was last updated.
Know where a vulnerable component would sit in your systems.
A CVE names a product. Whether it matters depends on where that product sits in your systems: what reaches it, which trust boundary it guards and what it can reach once compromised. Veriom maps your components, their relationships and your trust boundaries from your code, cloud and delivery evidence, so you can see where a component like this sits. The radar itself does not look at your systems.
Sources
- CVE records and CVSS scores from the NVD CVE API. This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD.
- Exploitation status from CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.
- Exploit likelihood from FIRST’s Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS), refreshed daily.
- Explanations are written by Veriom from fixed templates over each record’s data, not by a person reviewing each CVE. Descriptions are quoted from the records as published. The radar covers CVEs published since 4 Nov 2026, plus every CVE in the KEV catalog.